'Three questions Boris Johnson must answer about Ian Clement's expenses'

12.00.00am BST (GMT +0100) Thu 18th Jun 2009

Mike Tuffrey, the leader of the Liberal Democrat London Assembly Group, commenting on the revelations relating to Ian Clement's use of a City Hall corporate credit card said:

"First, over a period of nine months Ian Clement repeatedly broke City Hall rules about personal spending. Why did Boris Johnson allow this to continue?

"Second, why is Boris Johnson still allowing his senior staff to bill taxpayers for taking each other out to lunch and dinner?

"Third, will Boris Johnson now agree to publish the full expense details of all his senior staff, so the public can judge just what sort of regime is he running at City Hall?

"Boris Johnson's pledge in the last election to restore trust in City Hall finances now rings very hollow."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story
Comment on this news story
Previous news story: New approach to upgrading the tube now needed - Caroline Pidgeon (Wed 17th Jun 2009).
Next news story: Questions still need to be answered following Ian Clement's resignation - Mike Tuffrey (Mon 22nd Jun 2009).

Related News Stories:

Mon 1st Mar 2010:

Wed 10th Feb 2010:

Wed 16th Dec 2009:

Mon 22nd Jun 2009:

Wed 20th May 2009:

Thu 14th May 2009:

Tue 5th May 2009:

Mon 4th May 2009:

Wed 11th Feb 2009:

Wed 14th Jan 2009:

Thu 4th Dec 2008:

Wed 18th Jun 2008:

Related Press Articles:

Mon 22nd Feb 2010:

Wed 10th Feb 2010:

Wed 3rd Feb 2010:

Wed 27th Jan 2010:

Tue 26th Jan 2010:

Fri 22nd Jan 2010:

Mon 21st Dec 2009:

Wed 16th Dec 2009:

Wed 9th Dec 2009:

Tue 24th Nov 2009:

Mon 16th Nov 2009:

Fri 6th Nov 2009:

Wed 21st Oct 2009:

Mon 5th Oct 2009:

Wed 19th Aug 2009:

Tue 5th May 2009:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY.
Published and promoted by London Assembly Liberal Democrats, City Hall, The Queen's Walk, London SE1 2AA.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.